Against common opponents Seton Hall was 2-1, +5ppg, all at home; Princeton was 3-0, +12ppg, one each home/road/neutral.
I'm only sort of trolling here - it's probably fair to overweight games against tournament-quality competition, where Seton Hall built its resume. But we should be clear that's what we're doing (and not penalize the next mid-major with a stronger top-end resume for taking two bad losses).
Seton Hall: 38 SOR, 41 WAB, 56 KenPom, 64 NET
Princeton: 33 SOR, 30 WAB, 63 KenPom, 51 NET
Against common opponents Seton Hall was 2-1, +5ppg, all at home; Princeton was 3-0, +12ppg, one each home/road/neutral.
I'm only sort of trolling here - it's probably fair to overweight games against tournament-quality competition, where Seton Hall built its resume. But we should be clear that's what we're doing (and not penalize the next mid-major with a stronger top-end resume for taking two bad losses).